Preskoči na sadržaj
Digitalni repozitorijum Stomatološkog fakulteta u Pančevu

Pun zapis

dc:titleFunctional Mitral Regurgitation Post-Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement
dc:creatorDabić, Petar
dc:creatorVucucrevic, Bojan
dc:creatorSevkovic, Milorad
dc:creatorAndric, Dusan
dc:creatorPesic, Slobodan
dc:creatorBorovic, Sasa
dc:creatorPetrovic, Jovan
dc:subjectfunctional mitral regurgitation
dc:subjectisolated aortic valve replacement
dc:subjectprosthesis-patient mismatch
dc:subjectresidual mitral regurgitation
dc:subjectnatural history (disease)
dc:subjectprognostic factors
dc:subjecttransvalvular gradient
dc:subjectaortic valve prosthesis
dc:descriptionBackground: The management of mitral regurgitation during aortic valve replacement remains a complex question. Secondary mitral regurgitation often improves post-aortic valve replacement without mitral valve surgery, but residual mitral regurgitation can significantly affect long-term outcomes. This study investigates the natural history of mitral regurgitation following isolated aortic valve replacement and identifies prognostic factors for persistent mitral regurgitation. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 108 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. Patients were categorized based on mitral regurgitation improvement. Additionally, patients were divided into patient-prosthesis mismatch and non-patient-prosthesis mismatch groups based on the aortic prosthesis. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic data were analyzed. Results: In total, 63% of patients showed mitral regurgitation improvement. The improved functional MR group showed significant reductions in peak and mean transvalvular pressure gradients. In contrast, the patient-prosthesis mismatch group had persistent mitral regurgitation improvement in 59.2% of patients. The non-patient-prosthesis mismatch group exhibited significant structural improvements and a reduction in mitral regurgitation severity in 68.6% of patients. Conclusions: The study shows that aortic valve replacement could significantly improve MR when patient-prosthesis mismatch is avoided. This approach maximizes hemodynamic outcomes, mitigates the risk of residual or worsening mitral regurgitation, and potentially reduces the need for additional mitral valve interventions.
dc:publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
dc:date2024
dc:typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc:typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc:identifierhttps://stomatoloskifakultet.rs/nauka/publikacija/808
dc:identifierDOI 10.3390/jcm13226971
dc:identifierISSN 2077-0383
dc:sourceJournal of Clinical Medicine 13(22): 6971
dc:languageen
dc:rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc:rightsSva prava zadržana